Rachel Reeves has criticized the Tories and Reform UK as the government unveils significant legislation to eliminate the harsh two-child benefit restriction. The Chancellor has accused Nigel Farage of inconsistency on the issue, while Reform leader Kemi Badenoch stated that her party intends to oppose the changes and reinstate the limit, which has been linked to child poverty.
In an interview with The Mirror prior to introducing the legislation to eliminate the policy, Ms. Reeves highlighted the potential actions of the Tories and Reform, expressing concerns about their stance despite the impact on working families. She emphasized the societal harm caused by child poverty and criticized the shifting positions of Reform, pointing out inconsistencies in their promises.
Keir Starmer also raised concerns about the plans of the Tory and Reform UK, warning that such actions could push hundreds of thousands of children back into poverty if those parties win power. Labour’s analysis suggested that reinstating the policy, as proposed by the Conservatives, would result in 470,000 children falling back into poverty, while Reform’s adjustments would only benefit a small fraction of affected children.
Mr. Starmer emphasized Labour’s commitment to lifting nearly half a million children out of poverty, contrasting this with the potential repercussions of the Tory and Reform plans. He stressed the importance of not leaving any child behind and outlined Labour’s determination to create a more inclusive society.
Ms. Reeves had previously announced plans to eliminate the two-child limit as a means to lift thousands of children out of poverty, a move praised by child poverty advocates. She rejected calls for mandatory child poverty targets, arguing that such measures could limit future governments’ flexibility.
The Chancellor highlighted the importance of continued support for a Labour government to safeguard the changes aimed at benefiting children and families. She emphasized the tangible impact of political decisions on children’s living conditions and highlighted the distinctions between major political parties based on their policies and outcomes.
Overall, the debate surrounding the two-child benefit limit reflects broader political differences and the potential implications for vulnerable children in society.