Families impacted by the Manchester Arena bombing expressed their reservations about the proposed Hillsborough law, which they believe may lead to cover-ups. They met with Sir Keir Starmer to voice concerns over potential exemptions for intelligence services from the law’s transparency requirements, but left the meeting feeling disappointed.
Ruth Leney, head of the Manchester Arena Support Network, emphasized the need for full accountability without any dilution, particularly regarding security services. Campaigners cautioned that the draft version of the Hillsborough Law could enable intelligence chiefs to shield failures under the guise of national security.
In the aftermath of the 2017 Arena bombing, where MI5 was found to have obscured critical intelligence, campaigners stressed the importance of transparency. Despite reassurances from Sir Keir Starmer that the duty of candour would apply to intelligence services, concerns lingered about the proposed amendments to the Bill.
Recent government amendments aimed to bring intelligence agencies under the law’s purview, pending approval from top officials. However, critics like Elkan Abrahamson argued that these changes could grant unchallengeable authority to security service heads in deciding what information to disclose.
Devastated by the amendments, parents like Caroline Curry, who lost a child in the attack, felt misled and underscored the importance of standing up for accountability. Lisa Rutherford echoed the sentiment, expressing doubt in the government’s promises and calling for honesty in the process.
While MPs postponed debates on the Hillsborough Law to address campaigners’ worries, families stressed the need for robust legislation that prevents security services from evading scrutiny. The law, named after the tragic 1989 Hillsborough disaster, aims to ensure accountability and transparency in public offices.
In response to criticisms, the government reiterated its commitment to balancing national security with transparency. However, Liverpool MP Ian Byrne vowed to push for amendments that hold security services fully accountable unless the government revises its stance.
The ongoing dialogue between families, campaigners, and policymakers reflects the importance of upholding transparency and accountability in the face of national security concerns.